Weekly Movie Reviews: Sep 17-23, 2017

Favorite Movie of the Week

The Quick and the Dead (1995)

I love Westerns and I didn’t realize that a Western with a female gunfighter protagonist was missing from my life until I read about this movie. And it’s directed by Sam Raimi and he makes good movies.

A mysterious female gunslinger (Sharon Stone) arrives in Redemption, an Old West town controlled by local outlaw John Herod (Gene Hackman), just in time to sign up for the Herod’s gun-fighting competition. She isn’t just there for the prize money, though – she has an old score to settle. Her simple plan is complicated by the rules of the contest as well as her friendships with fellow competitors the Kid (Leonardo DiCaprio) and Cort (Russell Crowe), who she may have to hurt to get to her final target.

The Quick and the Dead follows all the usual Western tropes – mysterious stranger riding into a town that needs saving, a villainous outlaw, plenty of gunslinging, but what it lacks in originality it makes up for in style. I was worried that Sharon Stone’s character would either be too vulnerable or too much like a male character, but she was written and acted perfectly. She is both realistic and terrifyingly good. This was Russell Crowe’s American debut and one of Leonardo DiCaprio’s earliest movies (he’s adorable!) and they were talented actors even back then. And Gene Hackman is delightfully despicable as the villainous Herod.

Other Movies Watched

Starship Troopers (1997)

It is the 23rd century and humans are now a spacefaring species. The government is controlled by the military, citizenship and the right to vote only awarded to people who have chosen to join federal service, and Earth is constantly at war with an alien species (the Bugs). We follow rich kid turned mobile infantryman Johnny Rico as he rises through the ranks of the military.

I did not like this movie when I first saw it because I had recently read Heinlein’s Starship Troopers and this movie is tonally very different from the book despite sharing a few character names and a general plot. I’ve watched it a few more times since and now it’s one of my favorite sci-fi movies. On the surface the movie is about Johnny Rico and his friends finding their place in the world and that’s a satisfactory story on its own, but it’s also a biting look at jingoism and propaganda. Director Paul Verhoeven (Robocop, Total Recall) is at his element here with his trademark action, violence, and satire, and it is marvelous.

Garden State (2004)

Zach Braff writes, directs, and stars in this film about a discontented young man who returns to his New Jersey hometown after nine years of being away to attend his mother’s funeral. He meets up with his old friends, meets a girl, and eventually comes to terms with his life.

This movie reminded me of a better version of Elizabethtown. I’d seen it before but I didn’t remember most of it. It was a lot better than I remember it being, though, and it has clearly influenced a lot of later quirky indie dramas (including Natalie Portman’s “manic pixie dream girl” character that pre-dated the term’s coining). Zach Braff is extremely sympathetic as the over-medicated and withdrawn Andrew, especially once the tragic circumstances about why he hasn’t been home in nine years are revealed. The other characters in the movie are also compelling and I particularly liked Peter Sarsgaard’s role. This is a hard movie to describe because not much happens, the characters make you somewhat viscerally uncomfortable (because they are, too) but by the end it’s brand of earnestness has won you over.

Deep Impact (1998)

Deep Impact follows a group of people over a year as they deal with the impending threat of extinction caused by an asteroid on a collision course with the Earth. There’s high school student Leo Biederman (who helped discover the asteroid), reporter Jenny Lerner who first stumbled upon the story, the six astronauts on the Messiah spacecraft sent to stop the asteroid, the president of the United States, and some of the people around each of them.

This was a re-watch for me so of course I liked it. I’m not sure why Armageddon is so much more famous than Deep Impact given that they both came out at the same time but this is a much better movie. I’m guessing it might be because Armageddon is basically an action movie but Deep Impact is firmly a science-fiction drama. It tries to genuinely take a look at how the world would be affected by a impending disaster of such magnitude: what preparations and countermeasures would be taken, how everyday people would react, how it would affect national priorities and foreign relations, and so on. The characters are diverse enough that we get a lot of different perspectives (although all American, I read that the movie didn’t have enough of a budget to show anything from other countries even though they wanted to) and the cast playing them is fairly well-known, I recognized a lot of the side characters as well.

Cop Land (1997)

I found out about this movie when I was looking up Logan‘s director James Mangold and couldn’t believe I’d never heard of it before. It’s set in suburban New Jersey and follows Freddy Heflin, the sheriff of a town that many NYC police officers have settled in. After a young police officer is believed to have committed suicide, the ensuing events make the underlying tensions in town bubble up to the surface and Freddy can no longer turn a blind eye.

The cast of this movie is almost unbelievable, it has so many people that are famous for their roles in police and/or gangster stories – Sylvester Stallone, Ray Liotta, Robert De Niro, Harvey Keitel, and Robert Patrick. Stallone plays the protagonist, Freddy, whoe’s half-deaf, lonely, and beaten down (very unlike Stallone’s usual roles). For most of the movie I just wanted to give him a big hug and tell him to cheer up. The movie takes full advantage of its ensemble cast, though and it doesn’t make even who the protagonist is clear until well into the movie. Mangold is great at unlikely heroes (see 3:10 to Yuma and Logan) and this movie is a perfect fit for him. It keeps you at the edge of your seat and it’s emotionally satisfying.

Superman (1978)

Even though I enjoy superhero movies, I’d never seen the original Superman movie series which have been hugely influential in the genre. I probably don’t need to summarize the premise of this movie, it’s an origin story for Superman covering his voyage from Krypton, his youth living on a farm in the country, and his discovery of the Fortress of Solitude/acceptance of his powers.

Although the movie has a few obvious flaws, I enjoyed it a lot better than I thought I would. It’s a fairly straightforward superhero movie of the older style where we don’t really see the hero’s journey – of course Superman is a hero does what he does, we don’t need to know his motivations. Christopher Reeve’s portrayal of both Superman is terrific; his constant almost-smirk takes the character from boringly perfect to lovable, especially when he’s clearly hamming up his cluelessness as Clark Kent. I thought Lois Lane was also portrayed very well by Margot Kidder; I thought her character would be the usual screaming damsel of distress and she did do some of that but she also had her own role as a fiercely independent woman who cared deeply about her work. I could have skipped her inner (rhyming!) monologue when she’s flying around with Superman. Lex Luthor could have used some major improvement though, he’s a stereotypical insane, campy, nebulously murderous villain and an absolute waste of Gene Hackman.

St. Elmo’s Fire (1983)

It seems like we’ve been watching a lot of movies about people grappling with their recent adulthood (Reality Bites, Singles, Diner) and St. Elmo’s Fire is more of the same, this time with people who came of age in the ’80s. We follow a group of seven friends (four men and three women) as they come to terms with their lives, careers, and loves.

It took me a long time to take the characters seriously because half the cast of The Breakfast Club is in this movie and they look exactly like the same (both movies came out in the same year) even though they are supposed to be a few years older. The movie explores the usual coming of age themes – emotional maturity, taking responsibility for the consequences of your actions, and making sure your relationships are healthy. I can’t really think of any glaring flaws with the movie and I didn’t dislike it but I also don’t have any desire to watch it ever again. I think it’s because many of the characters seemed entitled (realistically so) and the narrative actually rewards them for it rather than making it something they need to overcome, It didn’t really feel like some of the characters came of age by the end.

Weekly Movie Reviews: Sep 10-16, 2017

Favorite Movie of the Week

The Hunt for Red October (1990)

I always feel a little bad when I pick a movie that I’ve already seen as my favorite movie of the week, but most of the movies that we re-watch are exceptional movies so it’s hard to find things that top them. I didn’t remember much about The Hunt for Red October except that I enjoyed it so I was looking forward to seeing it again.

Notorious Russian submarine captain Marko Ramius is given command of the Red October, a prototype submarine with a top-secret silent propulsion system. When he goes against orders and makes his way towards the United States, CIA analyst Jack Ryan must convince his government that Ramius does not mean harm as an international crisis brews.

Most of this movie consists of people talking in enclosed rooms but it somehow manages to maintain significant tension all the way through. There is some action (and it’s well-done; director John McTiernan also made the greatest action movie of all time: Die Hard), but Jack Ryan solves most problems using his brain, not with violence. The cast is amazing. Sean Connery plays Ramius, Alec Baldwin (back when he was young and dashing) plays Jack Ryan, and Scott Glenn, Sam Neill, James Earl Jones, Courtney B. Vance, Tim Curry, and Fred Dalton Thompson are all in it too. It’s hard to single things out as good about this movie – it’s one of those movies that just works and is more than the sum of its parts.

Other Movies Watched

End of Watch (2012)

I first heard of End of Watch while reading about director/writer David Ayer when reading about his upcoming movie, Bright (which is an urban fantasy starring Will Smith and I have high hopes for it). I’m a fan of Ayer’s other work; he wrote Training Day (featuring one of Denzel Washington’s most memorable roles) and wrote and directed the World War II movie Fury.

The movie follows two LAPD cops, Brian Taylor (Jake Gyllenhaal) and Miguel Zavala (Michael Peña) during their work for almost a year. It’s shot using a combination of traditional camera techniques and the found footage style (explained in-world through Taylor filming their work for a film project). It focuses more on their day-to-day lives rather than an overarching plot, although by the end it tells a coherent story. David Ayer has written a few movies about the LAPD but unlike his previous movies that focus on corruption, this one follows good cops doing their jobs well. The camaraderie between Taylor and Zavala is palpable, but the tropes that go along with the buddy cop genre are nowhere to be seen. The movie is funny, poignant, utterly engrossing, and I highly recommend it.

When Harry Met Sally… (1989)

When Harry Met Sally… Movie Poster (1989)

This is one of those classic movies that I’d just never gotten around to watching although I’d seen it quoted and referenced more times than I could count. I’ve seen other Meg Ryan romantic comedies (You’ve Got Mail, Sleepless in Seattle) and found her supremely annoying in them, plus I’m not a big fan of romantic comedies; I had low expectations going in. I was delighted to find that When Harry Met Sally… is a great movie.

We follow Harry Burns (Billy Crystal) and Sally Albright (Meg Ryan), who cross paths a couple of times over a few years before they finally become friends. When I watch most romantic comedies I need to suspend my belief somewhat, romances in movies don’t follow the same rules as real life. However Harry and Sally seemed like real people who reacted to things like normal people and that made me much more invested in their story. There’s certainly some drama like the (in)famous fake orgasm scene and the very end of the movie, but most of their behavior seemed just like people I knew in real life. I read that Sally was based on screenwriter Nora Ephron’s personality and Harry had a lot in common with director Rob Reiner, so maybe that helped with the realism. It was nice to actually see a relationship evolve naturally and I wish more romantic comedies did that.

The Man in the Moon (1991)

The Man in the Moon is the coming of age story of Dani Trant, a fourteen year old girl growing up in Louisiana during the summer of 1957. There are a number of recent changes to her life – her older sister is about to head off to Duke, her mother is pregnant with a fourth child, and the long-absent Foster family has moved back in to the next farm over, including their handsome 17 year old son, Court. Dani develops feelings for Court but life throws a few complications her way.

Dani is played by a fourteen year old Reese Witherspoon (in her debut role) and she is instrumental in making this movie as good as it is. She imbues Dani with a mix of vitality and vulnerability and has great chemistry with Jason London, who plays Court. The relationships between various members of the Trant family seemed realistic, especially the central relationship between Dani and her older sister. It is relatively rare that movies have characterization as nuanced as this one. This isn’t always a happy movie to watch, but it’s well worth it.

Europa Report (2013)

Europa Report is near-future science fiction about the six-member crew of a privately funded mission to Europa (one of Jupiter’s moons) sent to investigate the possibility of life. It’s a found footage film, ostensibly pieced together from the video cameras in the spacecraft and news and media interviews.

I was pleasantly surprised to find out that this movie was hard science fiction and pretty decent to boot. It’s certainly got flaws (the dialogue was sometimes too clichéd) but overall I think it did a fantastic job of exploring both the awe and terror of space exploration. I like stories that focus on the best of humanity and the crew of Europa One certainly qualified (although they would have been even more sympathetic if they had better dialogue). The movie reminded me a little of Gareth Edwards’ Monsters, it had the same qualities even though the plots are very different.

Risky Business (1983)

Joel is a straight-laced teenager who studies hard and stays out of trouble. When his parents go on vacation for a week, his friends persuade him to take advantage of his situation and take some risks. One thing leads to another and he soon finds himself in deep trouble with only a couple of days before his parents get back.

I’ve been wanting to see Risky Business for a long time because of the famous Tom-Cruise-dances-around-without-any-pants scene; I didn’t know anything else about the movie though. It’s a decent movie, although it had an inconsistent tone, particularly towards the end. Joel seemed much too naive for his age, he’s adorable but his behavior/reasoning was too childlike and it was uncomfortable to watch when combined with the very sexual plot. But all the actors do a terrific job and the soundtrack is particularly awesome, so it’s still worth watching.

Mr. Mom (1983)

When engineer Jack Butler (Michael Keaton in his very first top-billed role) loses his job and is unable to find a new one, he has to be the stay-at-home parent while his wife becomes the main breadwinner. Taking care of the kids and the house isn’t as easy as he envisioned though, and all sorts of disasters ensue.

This movie is pretty funny at times; Michael Keaton has impeccable comic timing. It definitely shows its age, though. A lot of the “funny” situations like Jack’s domestic incompetence and the open lechery displayed by his wife’s boss end up seeming either over-the-top or sad (or both). I also wish the end of the movie had been a little less clichéd, it didn’t challenge the status quo at all.

Weekly Movie Reviews: Sep 3-9, 2017

Favorite Movie of the Week

Diner (1982)

Diner follows a group of five friends in their early twenties as they struggle with the transition into adulthood. It is set in Baltimore in the late ’50s and stars Steve Guttenberg, Daniel Stern, Tim Daly, Kevin Bacon, Paul Reiser and (an unrecognizable) Mickey Rourke.

I feel like every decade has its own “group of friends dealing with becoming adults” movie (e.g. Singles for the early ’90s) and this is the one for the ’50s. The characters and the issues they’re wrestling with are instantly recognizable, even if the culture around them isn’t as familiar. In one way or another they’re all rebelling against their new responsibilities and the maturity expected of them. It’s nice to see that some of the problems people associate with millennials aren’t unique, other generations faced them too. I read that the cast had some time to get to know each other before filming began and that many of the scenes were improvised. That really comes through in the movie; their camaraderie seems so genuine.

I’m surprised that this Diner isn’t talked about given how good it is (although I did find a great article about how influential it is; if it can turn Nick Hornby into a obsessive fanboy, it has to be pretty good). Apparently this is one of four films written and directed by Barry Levinson based on his time living in Baltimore. I’m looking forward to seeing the other three.

Other Movies Watched

Working Girl (1988)

Secretary Tess McGill has been trying to improve her career prospects with little success. She’s put herself through night school, she’s suggested good ideas to her bosses, and she works very hard, but nothing has worked – in fact her boss Katharine has stolen her idea and passed it off as her own. When Katharine breaks her leg skiing and is out of commission for a few weeks, Tess takes the opportunity to steal her idea back by pretending that she is an executive.

The premise of this movie is similar to the Michael J. Fox movie The Secret of My Success that came out a year prior, but this one is much more of a drama. Tess comes from a blue collar background and she’s struggling to break through the glass ceiling that people that come from a more privileged background don’t seem to realize even exists. Melanie Griffith as Tess annoyed me a little bit because I thought she needed to be more assertive but I realized that that was exactly the point the movie was trying to make. Harrison Ford and Sigourney Weaver are great as the supporting characters as well.

The Parent Trap (1961)

When lookalikes Sharon and Susan meet at summer camp, they take an instant dislike to each other. Eventually they realize that they are twins – their mother and father divorced when they were young and took one child each. They decide to switch places so that they can get to know their other parent better and hopefully persuade them to get back together. Hijinks ensue.

This movie has a silly premise but it’s actually really good. Hayley Mills does a fantastic job at playing both twins, it’s easy to distinguish which character she’s playing except for when she’s trying to make herself indistinguishable for the plot. I liked the actors playing the parents as well, they have great chemistry and what should have been a clichéd reunion actually seems convincing – you’ve seen them without each other and they just don’t seem fully there until they’re together.

Free State of Jones (2016)

Free State of Jones is based on the true story of Mississippi farmer Newton Knight’s rebellion against the Confederacy during the Civil War. It follows Knight’s story over a few years, starting with his time as a Confederate soldier and ending a while after the Civil War.

This movie almost felt like a documentary or dramatization, it skipped over most of the dramatic scenes that a movie would ordinarily focus on. Matthew McConaughey does a good job playing Newton but he’s treated more like a heroic archetype than a real person, I can’t think of a single flaw in his character. The movie also intersperses the story of Davis Knight, Newton’s great-grandson who was prosecuted under Mississippi’s miscegenation laws in the 1940s, and I didn’t really see the point of that, it took me out of the main story.

The East (2013)

Jane (Brit Marling) is an operative who works for Hiller Brood, a private intelligence firm that caters to wealthy corporate clients. She takes on an assignment to go undercover and join a radical eco-terrorist organization that has been targeting companies they perceive as unethical. She finds herself growing attached to the people she meets and more compelled by their cause than she would like.

I think the best way to describe this movie is “almost great”. There is nothing wrong with it, it’s got a compelling premise, a solid cast who portray three-dimensional characters, it approaches a contentious topic without too much melodrama, but I kept feeling like something was missing. Maybe it’s because we see the movie through Jane’s eyes and she is not very interesting as a character, she mostly just observes what’s happening. I also found the ending rushed and what had been a nuanced movie until then suddenly morphed into a perfectly neat ending.

Greedy (1994)

The McTeague family has been trying to stay in their Uncle Joe’s good books throughout their lives, but even more so now that he is aging and might soon leave money to them. Their hopes are dashed when a young and pretty girl becomes Joe’s “caregiver”, so they hunt down Daniel McTeague, Joe’s estranged grandson. Daniel hasn’t seem his family ever since he was a kid but quickly gets pulled into their games, especially since his career as a professional bowler is ending and he needs money.

This is another one of those comedies where Michael J. Fox where he gets himself into trouble and has to extricate himself from it through a series of antics. Unlike his other movies though, this doesn’t have much heart. There are some funny moments but it’s mostly just an over-the-top comedy that doesn’t really care about characterization. It was entertaining but I’m never going to want to watch it again.

Man of the Year (2006)

When comedian and television talk show host Tom Dobbs (Robin Williams) decides to run for President as an independent candidate, he doesn’t expect to actually get elected. Meanwhile programmer Eleanor Green (Laura Linney) who works for the company that developed the electronic voting machines used for the election discovers a flaw in the vote counting mechanism – which means that Tom is not actually the legitimate President-elect.

I wanted to like this movie, it’s got a great cast (Christopher Walken and Jeff Goldblum are in the movie too) and it’s written and directed by Barry Levinson, who did Diner (reviewed above), Rain Man, and Good Morning Vietnam which are all excellent. It just wasn’t very good, though. It tries to be both a comedy and a thriller (with doses of drama and romance) and it’s jarring to switch between Tom making jokes to Eleanor running for her life. Robin Williams does his best with the material and elevates the movie a little but even his jokes aren’t consistently funny.

A tangential note: it was interesting to watch this movie in light of the last presidential election since Robin Williams plays an independent candidate who people vote for because he’s populist and not a career politician. I also wish the media actually gave independent candidates screen time like they showed in the movie.

Weekly Movie Reviews: Aug 27-Sep 2, 2017

Favorite Movie of the Week

Wolf Children (2012)

Wolf Children is Mamoru Hosoda’s third original movie, after The Girl Who Leapt Through Time and Summer Wars. It follows Hana, a woman who falls in love with a wolf shapeshifter. They marry and have two young children (who are also wolf shapeshifters) but tragedy strikes when Hana’s husband dies suddenly. She must now raise her two children alone without any support while also providing for both their human and wolf needs.

The premise of this movie sounded a little weird to me when I first read about it but I didn’t have to consciously suspend disbelief at all, the movie pulled me right in. Hosoda has said that his movies all revolve around certain themes – The Girl Who Leapt Through Time is about youth, Summer Wars is about family, and Wolf Children is about motherhood. I think it’s one of the best depictions of the challenges and rewards of being a good mother that I’ve seen (disclaimer: I’m not a parent). The two children, Ame and Yuki, are nothing like each other and their reactions to events are often as dissimilar as you can get. They are each demanding in their own way, and Hana manages to be an amazing mother to both and never gives up even when the going is tough.

This movie made me pretty emotional, especially at the end. It even makes me emotional to just think about some of the events while writing this review. Not many movies do that. It’s quiet and thoughtful but the pacing doesn’t bore you and the characters and setting will stay with you for a while after you watch it. I highly recommend it!

Other Movies Watched

The Weather Man (2005)

David Spritz is a down-on-his-luck news station weatherman working for a Chicago TV station. It seems like everything that can go wrong in his life is going wrong; he’s a recent divorcee, his two kids have serious issues, his relationship with his father is stiff, and on top of everything the people who recognize him on the street often throw food at him for some reason. He hopes to make a new life in New York if he gets the job he applied for, but nothing is going right for him.

People often make fun of Nicolas Cage but he is a great dramatic actor (see Adaptation. and Lord of War for examples). He makes this movie succeed as well as it does, his character is constantly doing things that make his situation worse and you might be yelling at the screen in frustration but you still feel a lot of empathy for him. It reminded me a little of American Beauty in that the main character is a somewhat pathetic middle-aged man but finds purpose by the end (although the way it unfolds is quite different). I also liked the ending of this movie because it chose not to be overly sentimental or stereotypical and actually went with the choices that made sense for David’s personality.

Wonder Woman (2017)

Wonder Woman is the fourth film in the DC extended universe and tells the origin story of superhero Wonder Woman a.k.a. Diana Prince (whom we’ve already seen in Batman vs. Superman). It’s set during World War I; an American pilot on the run finds Diana’s hidden island home of Themyscira. He talks to her about the war raging across the world and that horrifies her and makes her determined to help stop it.

People are talking about this movie everywhere and I’m not surprised because it’s fantastic. Gal Gadot is superb as Wonder Woman; I had my doubts about her originally because the only thing I’d seen her in was the Fast and the Furious franchise, but her appearance in Batman vs. Superman dissolved most of them. Diana is naive and wears her heart on her sleeve but she’s also incredibly powerful and confident at the same time; Gadot portrays this nuance beautifully. The supporting cast was outstanding, I particularly liked seeing Robin Wright as Diana’s aunt and martial instructor, and Chris Pine playing the pilot, Steve Trevor. His character is the emotional heart of the movie and he’s the perfect mix of idealistic, lovable, and exasperated.

The movie does have some flaws, I thought that the romance between Diana and Steve was a little contrived and I would have liked for it to develop a little more slowly. I would have also liked Diana to have more agency, it seems like she’s mostly reacting to people and events around her rather than seeking them out herself. That might be an unfair criticism given that this is an origin story, though.

Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels (1998)

Eddy, a card-playing prodigy, and three of his friends band together to raise a hundred thousand pounds so that he can enter a high-stakes card game and make a lot more. The plan doesn’t quite work, and the four of them end up owing five times their original investment to a gangster known for his brutality. Their attempts to raise the money result in a comedy of errors involving the friends, their neighbors, gangsters, weed-growers, loan sharks, thugs, and probably a few other people I’m forgetting.

This is one of those movies that follows a bunch of different characters that seem unrelated at first but the threads come together gradually to tell a single story. It’s funny, clever, violent, and heavily stylized – sort of like Tarantino (it reminded me a little of Pulp Fiction) but the camerawork and direction is very different. I haven’t watched a lot of director Guy Ritchie’s movies, but as I understand it, this style is his trademark. It’s an impressive movie, especially for a debut director. It takes significant skill to intertwine the number of stories in this movie and have them all come together as tightly as it did. The actors are all great as well, I read that a bunch of them had never professionally acted before (including Jason Statham, who was apparently found by the production team as a street vendor) and it gives the movie a sense of authenticity.

Colombiana (2011)

After Cataleya’s parents are killed in front of her by drug lord Don Luis, she manages to escape to her uncle’s house in Chicago. Her uncle and grandmother try to give her a normal life but she continues to be determined to avenge her family. She grows up to be a deadly assassin committing vigilante murders around the country in order to draw Don Luis’s forces out.

This movie has been on our list for years. I’m not sure why it took us so long. It’s written by Luc Besson (apparently it was originally meant as a sequel to Lëon, but Natalie Portman was unavailable) and he’s good at writing kick-ass women. Zoë Saldana has played dangerous women before and she’s terrific in this movie; she manages to make Cataleya seem both tough and vulnerable at the same time. The action sequences are fun and the pacing is good. The movie did have a few glaring flaws, though – I thought the climactic fights felt too much like a video game’s boss fight, Cataleya handles most opponents effortlessly except for the last one or two, it took me out the movie a little bit. Also, Cataleya’s boyfriend Danny was pretty one-dimensional which stood out because none of the other characters seemed that way.

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 (2017)

The Guardians of the Galaxy have been a team for a while now, capitalizing on their fame from saving the galaxy to get mercenary jobs. When their most recent job goes awry, they are saved by Ego, a mysterious being who says he is Star-Lord’s long lost father and wants them to visit his planet. But the family reunion doesn’t work out as planned and the Guardians need to save the galaxy yet again.

I enjoyed the first Guardians of the Galaxy movie quite a bit and this one offers more of the same. I think I’m getting a little tired of Marvel’s formula though because I got tired of the constant formulaic (and bad) jokes and superficial character arcs. It did keep me entertained the whole way through but at the end I didn’t feel satisfied and I don’t think the movie earned its attempt at emotional payoff, especially given that it retconned the personalities of some characters from the first movie with no explanation. I was looking forward to seeing Kurt Russell as Ego but he was mostly wasted. Also, the soundtrack to this movie (a critical element in Vol. 1) didn’t seem as fun either. The most interesting part of the movie was Karen Gillan’s Nebula, whose intensity actually sells her transition from villain to reluctant hero, but she isn’t in it that much.

Mean Girls (2004)

Mean Girls stars Lindsay Lohan as Cady Heron, a teenager who has spent most of her life being home-schooled in Africa, as she moves back to the United States and starts high school. She joins the “Plastics”, the most popular (and mean) girls in the school so that she can spy on them for her real friends, but slowly starts getting sucked into being one of them herself.

I’ve been wanting to watch this movie for a long time since it get referenced all the time, especially by people of my generation. I didn’t like it much, though. The movie plays it like Cady is an earnest character, but I thought she seemed like a fake person the entire time and couldn’t invest in her story. The love interest, Aaron, doesn’t seem like he has any agency, he spends the whole movie being successfully manipulated by everyone around him to serve the needs of the plot and I was hoping until the end that he wouldn’t turn out to be the actual love interest. The movie just seemed shallow, even compared to other teen dramedies.

Rachel McAdams did an excellent job as the queen bee (and Cady’s nemesis) Regina; she is almost unrecognizable. I saw her name in the credits and I was wondering when she would show up. My husband had to point out that she was playing Regina and had already been in the movie for a while.

Book review: The Stone Sky by N.K. Jemisin

I’ve been looking forward to the release of The Stone Sky ever since I read the previous books in the series, The Fifth Season and The Obelisk Gate, (both of which have now won the Best Novel Hugo!) earlier this year. I devoured it as soon as I received it and it’s just as good as I thought it would be.

I don’t want to say too much about the story, it’s the third book of the series so pretty much everything is a spoiler. The Stone Sky does add a new viewpoint and it’s probably the most fascinating one so far. We explore the history of the world and how exactly it ended up being the way it is. We see things from the perspectives of Essun and her daughter Nassun, of course, they are the heart of the book.

The end of The Obelisk Gate had mother and daughter on a collision course (somewhat literally) and I wasn’t sure how the book would wrap up the story in a satisfying way because both characters were equally sympathetic, they’d both been through more than their fair share of horrible things. The conclusion was completely satisfying though, now that I’ve read it, I can’t imagine how else it would have ended.

Like the previous books, this book is sometimes agonizing to read, Much of fantasy focuses on the best things about people (honorable, idealistic, heroic, etc.) but this book does the opposite. It shows people at their worst, but not unrealistically so (I wouldn’t call it “grimdark”), and some of things that Essun and Nassun do and have done to them is quite unpleasant to read about. But there are still uplifting moments, and that’s even more hopeful than always seeing people as good because you see humans do good things even when everything around them is terrible.

N.K. Jemisin’s next project is apparently a contemporary Lovecraftian fantasy series set in New York, and I can’t wait for that to come out.


The Stone Sky by N.K. Jemisin (The Broken Earth, #3)
Orbit Books, 2017 | Buy the book
I received a free review copy of this book from the publisher or author.


Book series review: Raven’s Shadow by Anthony Ryan

I’ve been meaning to read Anthony Ryan’s Raven’s Shadow series for a long time but kept putting it off because so many people said the second and third books didn’t live up to the promise of the first one. After reading The Waking Fire (the first book of his new series), I wanted more so I decided to finally make the plunge.

The first book, Blood Song, follows Vaelin Al Sorna from his initiation into the religious/militaristic Sixth Order at the age of ten through his meteoric rise to become the most famous (or infamous, depending on who you’re talking to) warrior in the known world. I have a bias towards fantasy books about school/training/coming of age and this is a great example of that sub-genre, similar to Red Sister by Mark Lawrence. Vaelin is a terrific protagonist, he’s a natural leader but works hard for what he gets, he never seems like a Mary Sue character despite the accolades he receives. The plot is fine but it is dwarfed by the great characterization and emotional arc.

The next two books, Tower Lord and Queen of Fire are a total change of pace, the story shifts to being about the events happening across the entire world and we get a bunch of new viewpoint characters. Vaelin is still among them, but he’s done most of his growing in the first book so his viewpoints are more boring – his role is now just being the wise mentor figure and/or fearsome enemy to everyone else in the story.

I’m conflicted about how I feel about this changed structure, it makes sense that the author wanted to tell a broader story about saving the world, but that makes the book seem more generic because the wonderful character arc of a single viewpoint character is what made it stand out in the first place. The new viewpoint characters are fine but they suffer in comparison to Vaelin because we can’t spend as much time with them – Vaelin got a whole book to himself – and so they seem much less fleshed out.

The way the story wrapped up in Queen of Fire definitely had problems, significant characters from previous books were dropped with no resolution of their fates, the main plot with the war felt more and more improbable and much too easily resolved, and overall, it just didn’t offer enough satisfaction. Knowing that this was the conclusion that was being set up made me like the previous books less. I think the series is worth reading for Blood Song, though.


Blood Song by Anthony Ryan (Raven's Shadow, #1)
Ace Books, 2013 | Buy the book


Book series review: The Dresden Files (1-15) by Jim Butcher

I’ve owned the first eight Dresden Files books for a couple of years now and I kept meaning to read them and never getting around to it. I did read the first book, Storm Front, a few years ago but didn’t love it enough to continue (I didn’t dislike it either, I just kept getting distracted by other books). I also haven’t been compelled by most urban fantasy that I’ve read so I figured the genre just wasn’t for me. One of my colleagues at work is a huge fan of the series, though, and talking about it with him nudged me into finally reading those eight books on my shelf… and then buying the next seven, and the anthology of Dresden stories, and all the Dresden graphic novels.

The Dresden Files is a series of novels featuring Harry Dresden, the only professional wizard in Chicago. He’s basically a private investigator but he can do things that ordinary people can’t do. The world of the books is superficially identical to our own, but there is a thriving community of magic users and/or non-humans under the surface (faeries, werewolves, vampires, ghouls, gods, dragons, and so on, pretty standard for its genre). Of course all the cases that Dresden gets ends up involving magic in some way, and many of them come from his work as a consultant for the Chicago police department.

I stand by my original assessment of the first book – Storm Front is decent but it definitely feels like a debut novel. In comparison to the later books, Dresden’s character seems a little rough, like the author was trying out a couple of different personalities for him but hadn’t figured out who exactly he was yet. It’s a stereotypical pulpy police procedural – guy with special powers partnered with a spunky female cop solving a series of murders involving (among other things) gore and wild orgies. But I was prepared for that since I’d read it before and people on the internet said the series really hit its stride a couple of books in, so I kept reading.

The second book, Fool Moon was better than the first but didn’t quite have me drawn in yet (all the different types of werewolves showing up in a single story seemed contrived, among other issues). I don’t think I was eager to read more until the end of the third book, so far the series had just seemed like a run-of-the-mill procedural, but Grave Peril didn’t have Karrin Murphy (the female cop) in it much at all, showing that it wasn’t going to keep following the same format. And the ending showed that the series wasn’t afraid to take risks and change things up. I felt like I was actually getting to know the characters and that they were realistic and would grow over the books.

After that I was pretty much hooked. One of the things I didn’t like about previous urban fantasy that I’ve read was that they seemed to take more inspiration from mystery novels than fantasy. I love Agatha Christie, for example, but Miss Marple or Poirot don’t change very much over the course of their stories, the fun of the books is in the solving of the crime. My favorite genres are epic fantasy and science fiction and a large part of why I love them is that they build interesting worlds and have characters that often have to come of age or rise to the occasion; their emotional growth is an integral part of the story. The Dresden Files has the best of both worlds, it does have investigative elements, but Harry and all the supporting characters all change in response to the events around them and not always in good ways.

Harry is not a perfect character, he’s got serious flaws and he’s aware of some of them. He’s not an anti-hero but he doesn’t always do the right thing (there often isn’t even a right thing) and the books don’t sugarcoat that. The people around him seem just as real, I can’t think of a single character who hasn’t made a serious mistake. Even characters that seemed stereotypical when they were first introduced (e.g. the tough female cop, the perfect Christian knight, the organized crime boss) are completely altered now.

I’ve mentioned that the series isn’t afraid to change things up, but it takes it to a (good) extreme in the twelfth book, aptly titled Changes. It turns Harry’s life upside down and the books after it breathe new life into the series while still being familiar enough to be cozy. And it’s not just the characters that change, the world gets more dangerous over the course of the books (and not just because Harry learns more and becomes a stronger wizard), it’s clearly building up to a larger conflict. This makes sense given what the author has said about the series – there are going to be around 20 standalone “single case” books and then a “big apocalyptic trilogy” at the end.

The only downside to these books is that the series is probably not going to be finished for at least a decade or more, I’m glad I got into it after 15 of the books were already out. But it’s not like there’s a shortage of books to read while waiting.


Storm Front by Jim Butcher (The Dresden Files, #1)
Roc, 2000 | Buy the book


Weekly Movie Reviews: Aug 20-26, 2017

Favorite Movies of the Week

The Hunt (2012)

I didn’t know anything about this movie before I watched it except that it was a critically acclaimed Danish movie starring Mads Mikkelsen (who is in a lot of great things, but I associate him most with his role as Le Chiffre in Casino Royale). I don’t think I’ve ever seen a Danish movie, the only reason I even heard about this one was because of a Reddit post.

Lucas is an elementary school teacher getting his life back together after his divorce. The kids at his school love him, he is beginning to date someone new, and his son wants to come and live with him. But when one of the kids he teaches makes up a story without knowing the implications of what she is saying, he’s falsely accused of molesting children and ends up being ostracized by almost everyone he knows.

This is a depressing movie but it’s exceptionally good. The way all the characters interacted with each other is infuriatingly accurate, from the well-intentioned but clearly incompetent psychologist to the indecisiveness of Klara’s father. Mads Mikkelsen is a spectacular actor and makes you intensely feel every emotion his character goes through. The kids in the movie are fantastic too, especially the girl who played Klara, she didn’t seem like she was acting. I don’t just want to single out the acting though, everything else about the movie was pretty much perfect, the directing, the atmosphere, the cinematography, the plot, the pacing… you get the idea.

The Ice Storm (1997)

I had never heard of this movie until I was looking through Ang Lee’s filmography recently. I’m a fan of Ang Lee (who isn’t?) so I was pleasantly surprised to discover that he had made several movies that I hadn’t seen. This one in particular stood out for the great cast – Kevin Kline, Joan Allen, Sigourney Weaver, Tobey Maguire, Katie Holmes, Elijah Wood, and a bunch more.

The movie follows the Hood family and the people around them for a couple of days around Thanksgiving. Parents Ben (Kevin Kline) and Elena (Joan Allen) have been unhappy for a long time and find that they can’t keep ignoring their problems. Their kids have their own issues: Wendy is exploring her nascent sexuality at every opportunity, and Paul, her older brother, is focused on gaining the affections of a rich classmate from his prep school.

Ang Lee is amazing at getting subtle and complex performances from his actors and The Ice Storm tells a story that depends on that nuance. It reminded me of his “Father Knows Best” trilogy (Pushing Hands, The Wedding Banquet, and Eat Drink Man Woman), except with American suburban families instead of Chinese families. I’m surprised that this movie isn’t more well-known, I think if it was released now it would be widely praised (it still did win critical acclaim when it came out, Gene Siskel called it his favorite film of the year, but it doesn’t seem to be that well known).

Other Movies Watched

Bright Lights, Big City (1988)

New York City yuppie Jamie Conway (Michael J. Fox) works as a fact checker for a magazine. His once perfect life has been falling apart after his mother dies and his wife leaves him. He’s been attempting to write a novel but can’t get anywhere with it, his boss at work is constantly frustrated with him, and he’s becoming increasingly dependent on cocaine to get through the day.

I was skeptical about Michael J. Fox starring in a drama since most of his movies from around the time were comedic to some extent. Bright Lights, Big City was actually a really good movie, though, and he was a big part of why it was good. His usual casual demeanor makes it seem even worse that his character is unhappy, unproductive, and addicted to drugs, treating it melodramatically wouldn’t have had the same impact. The situations he finds himself in are entirely his own doing, but you can’t help but root for him, and his eventual growth as a character feels like a huge relief. Also, the supporting cast is great, especially Kiefer Sutherland as Jamie’s hard-partying friend.

The Boondock Saints (1999)

After surviving a brush with Russian mobsters, Irish fraternal twins Connor and Murphy MacManus decide to take down organized crime in Boston. They are being pursued by an FBI agent who can’t decide whether to arrest them or hail them as heroes.

The Boondock Saints is extremely stylized and that’s what differentiates it from other action/vigilante movies. I’m not sure exactly how to describe the tone of the movie, the brothers believe that their actions are blessed by God and the movie takes their righteousness seriously. It’s violent, gory, and a lot of fun, sort of like a Tarantino movie. Norman Reedus and Sean Patrick Flanery make the MacManus brothers seem like nice guys even while they’re gunning down a bunch of people. The other characters are pretty funny too, but Willem Dafoe takes the cake as the curmudgeonly scenery-chewing Agent Smecker. It’s a ridiculous movie but I’m not surprised that it’s a cult classic.

Point Break (1991)

Rookie FBI agent Johnny Utah (Keanu Reeves) infiltrates the L.A. surfing scene in order to track down a gang of bank robbers. He ends up being more sucked into into the lifestyle than he originally thought, especially after meeting the charismatic surfer Bodhi (Patrick Swayze).

I thought this movie would be dumb fun just like the original Fast and the Furious movie, but once I got acclimatized to Keanu Reeves’ acting enough to take him seriously, it was better than I thought it would be (he makes it hard, though). It’s directed by Kathryn Bigelow, who’s made some great movies (like The Hurt Locker and Strange Days). Patrick Swayze is fantastic and the emotional arc of the movie wouldn’t have worked as well without his magnetic performance. Gary Busey as Utah’s partner Pappas was surprisingly great and he stole most scenes he was in. And of course there are a lot of great shots of waves and surfing that add a unique atmosphere to the movie.

Rules of Engagement (2000)

Rules of Engagement stars Tommy Lee Jones as Col. Hayes Hodges, a washed up military lawyer who is asked to defend his old friend and fellow officer Col. Terry Childers (Samuel L. Jackson) after he is accused of firing into a crowd of civilians that were protesting outside a U.S. embassy.

This movie reminded me of Courage Under Fire and A Few Good Men; military law movies seem like they were popular in the ’90s (this was released in 2000 but I think of anything pre-9/11 as the ’90s) although both of those were better. Rules of Engagement isn’t bad, most of it is decent, but it’s not very nuanced. Both lead actors do a good job, and it’s nice to see Samuel L. Jackson play a protagonist and not just a supporting character. I read that originally the events that led to Childers’ court martial were going to be left ambiguous but test audience’s reactions resulted in some scenes being added to the movie making what happened more explicit. I would have liked to watch that version of the movie.

Death Note (2017)

This movie was terrible and I had more to say about it than my usual 1-2 paragraphs, so I wrote a separate post for it, Movie review: Death Note (2017).

Movie review: Death Note (2017)

Death Note is about a Seattle high-school student, Light Turner, who finds a notebook (the titular Death Note) that gives its owner the ability to kill people simply by writing their name in it. He decides to use it to rid the world of criminals, but he soon attracts the interest of the world’s foremost detective, “L”, who is determined to catch him.

I’ve been anticipating this Death Note movie ever since I first heard about it. I’m a huge fan of the original anime, it has extremely compelling characters, fantastic pacing, and it’s probably the most clever show I’ve ever seen. I was interested in seeing how the characters would translate to an American setting (the movie is set in Seattle) and the casting of Willem Dafoe as the shinigami (death god) Ryuk was a great sign. And the movie is produced by Netflix, which has had a pretty good track record with original content.

Well, unfortunately this movie is terrible. It’s so bad that I’m doing my very first post reviewing only a single movie just so I can have more space to write about how much I hated it. I’m not usually so vehement about disliking a movie, I can usually find something to appreciate about it, but I can’t find much in this one. It’s not just a awful adaptation (I used to care about movie adaptations sticking to the source material but I’ve watched enough movies now to respect them as their own medium with different storytelling conventions), it’s a failure on every level.

One of the most interesting things about the original Death Note anime was that Light (Light Yagami, that is) was a genius. He does extremely well at anything he tries (he’s top ranked nationally in both standardized testing and tennis), he’s handsome and popular, so it makes sense that he has hubris enough to believe that he knows what’s best for the world. Throughout the show you both admire him and want him stopped immediately. His cat and mouse game with L (also a genius) has you fascinated from the very beginning because what they both do is entirely unpredictable but also makes total sense (and fits within the rules of the world).

I didn’t expect Light Turner to be exactly the same as Light Yagami, but I didn’t expect him to be so different either. He is an average whiny teenager who is bullied and there is zero reason to like him or even be sympathetic to him. He doesn’t even have much agency as a character, his actions are driven by either Ryuk’s urging or by the attention of a cheerleader that he has a crush on. None of the other characters are much better – Ryuk is probably the best one (Willem Dafoe is good like I predicted), but he’s not very nuanced either.

The over-simplification of the characters is a problem, but sadly it is not the only problem, or even most of the problem. The pacing is too fast in the beginning and too slow towards the end. The plot is more like a bunch of plotholes connected tenuously together (I’m not sure if that simile makes sense, but it still makes more sense than the movie). The tone jumps around all over the place from teen drama to horror to comedy to action (and none of it matches the tone of the source material). For some reason, there’s also gratuitous gore – the movie’s Light favors writing ridiculous death scenarios for his victims. I could maybe see an decent horror movie that could be re-edited from this movie, but movie that was released was not a decent anything. The actors do an okay job with what they’re given, but often what they’re given seems more contrived than a Disney Channel original movie.

The movie feels like the production team was given a one paragraph summary of the original manga/anime and that’s all the information they had to base their work on. Or maybe they thought that what made Death Note successful was its premise but it’s not. There are a million “what if” stories out there (that’s pretty much the definition of speculative fiction), and the idea of a teenager finding a Death Note is not that powerful on its own. Of course it wouldn’t have mattered if they didn’t stick to the source material if the movie had actually been good or interesting, but because it isn’t, it begs the question of why the people making it decided to explicitly get rid of all the advantages the source material came with.

If you haven’t watched the original anime, please don’t let this travesty of a movie put you off. I can’t comment on the manga since I haven’t read it, but I’m sure it’s excellent as well.

Weekly Movie Reviews: Aug 13-19, 2017

Favorite Movie of the Week

Dhobi Ghat (2010)

Dhobi Ghat follows the life of four interconnected people living in Mumbai. Shai (Monica Dogra) is a banker on sabbatical working on a project to chronicle the lives of Mumbai’s workers through photographs. Arun is a introverted artist looking for inspiration for her next project. Yasmin is a newly married immigrant from the state of Uttar Pradesh recording her experiences on a camcorder. Munna is a washerman (the titular “dhobi”) and rat-killer who aspires to become an actor.

If you’re familiar with indie movies, this is not a particularly special movie, it follows a few characters, it’s mostly slice-of-life but has characters that change subtly because of their interactions and experiences. But for an Indian movie, that makes it unique. It’s quiet, it has well-developed characters and nuanced acting, it offers an interesting perspective, and above all, it lacks melodrama. I’ve never seen an Indian movie that took that approach to storytelling (I haven’t seen many Indian indie films, though) and I want more! There were actually people I could identify with!

The score to this movie is fantastic too, it’s by two-time Academy Award winning Argentine composer Gustavo Santaolalla (though I’m most familiar with his work on the video game The Last of Us). I felt like the tone and atmosphere of Dhobi Ghat reminded me of Alejandro Iñárritu’s 21 Grams and Babel, I wonder how much of that was because all three movies were scored by the same person.

Other Movies Watched

Auntie Mame (1958)

I watched Auntie Mame a long time ago but didn’t remember much of it. When socialite Mame’s young nephew Patrick is orphaned at a young age, he comes to live with her. In order to keep Patrick from taking on too many of Mame’s free-spirited qualities, his father has appointed one of his stodgy business associates to be the executor of his estate and the boy’s trustee. The movie takes place over 18 years as Patrick grows up with both these influences in his life

Even though the story is structured around Patrick’s life, Mame is the protagonist. Rosalind Russell plays her part marvelously, she’s charming and exasperating at the same time, and you are both worried and glad that Patrick has her in his life. The movie is very well-paced, despite being almost two and a half hours long, it feels engrossing all the way through and you don’t know where the time went. The characters aren’t always consistent – for example, the events at the end are resolved much too neatly, but that’s one of the only things that dates the movie, otherwise it’s suited to modern sensibilities.

Midnight Cowboy (1969)

We’re slowly watching our way through all the Oscar Best Picture winners and got one more off the list with Midnight Cowboy. A young Jon Voight plays small-town Texan hustler Joe Buck who moves to New York City and hopes to use his cowboy image to become a successful male prostitute. He meets with limited success but befriends Enrico “Ratso” Rizzo (Dustin Hoffman), a small-time con artist.

I didn’t know anything about this movie before we watched it except that it starred Jon Voight and Dustin Hoffman and that it won the Oscar for Best Picture. I had actually assumed it was a Western. It’s very good, especially for the time in which it was made. It explores things like prostitution, poverty, gay relationships, sexual abuse, mental illness and I think that’s significant for 1969. Jon Voight is charming as the naive and optimistic Joe and Dustin Hoffman is great at going from sleazy and lovable – you get to know his character at the same pace that Joe does and your opinion changes accordingly.

One of the most notable things about this movie is its use of montages and images that represent Joe’s thoughts and memories, I think this must have been one of the first movies to experiment with those narrative techniques. Those sequences feel a little rough, like a new idea that hasn’t been thought through fully and it’s interesting to see the genesis of a technique we take for granted now. Also a fun fact: this movie was the only X-rated movie to win the Best Picture Oscar (although shortly after its release the rating criteria was changed and it was re-rated as R).

Rock of Ages (2012)

I’ve been looking forward to watching Rock of Ages ever since I ran into a clip of Tom Cruise singing Bon Jovi’s Wanted Dead of Alive while watching YouTube videos. I’m a big fan of 80’s rock, and the idea of a musical featuring entirely 80’s rock sounded excellent to me. The movie centers around the story of a young couple, Drew and Sherrie, who are both aspiring singers but it features an ensemble cast with their own (mainly romantic) subplots.

There are a lot of great things about this movie but unfortunately it’s not a very good movie overall. My husband described it as “less than the sum of its parts”, and I think that’s a good description. The songs aren’t bad (Tom Cruise has a good singing voice, and all the songs he does are particularly good) and the movie does a decent job of contriving situations that the songs will work well in. The actors seem like they’re having fun, especially Alec Baldwin who is cast against type and Catherine Zeta-Jones who plays a delightful scenery-chewing villain. I found the actual story of the film incredibly trite, though, especially Drew and Sherrie’s romance. The play that the movie was based on had a story that sounded much more interesting, but I read that the movie’s director didn’t care for the play and made a lot of changes, which is a great pity.

Alien: Covenant (2017)

Alien: Covenant is the latest movie in the Alien franchise and Ridley Scott’s first movie featuring the titular xenomorph since 1979. I enjoyed Ridley Scott’s Prometheus, and this movie was touted as both a sequel to Prometheus and a prequel to Alien. We follow the crew of the colonization ship Covenant who stop to investigate a signal that seems to be coming from a human source on an undiscovered habitable planet.

Of course this turns out to be a terrible idea and you already know what the outcome is going to be – monsters bursting out of people’s bodies and pretty much everyone dying. Alien and Prometheus succeeded in part because of their masterful suspense, which is completely absent in this film, you see everything coming ahead of time. Even the xenomorphs are shown in broad daylight. Plus the writing is bad – the characters make such monumentally stupid decisions that it makes it hard to invest in the movie because you can’t suspend your disbelief that far. However, it does do its job of connecting Prometheus into the continuity and offering more insight into the genesis of xenomorphs, and it’s still fun to watch.

The Best of Times (1986)

Jack Dundee (Robin Williams) is a bank manager haunted by the memory of a pass he missed in an high-school football game more than a decade ago – the only time his team ever came close to beating the neighboring town that has been their long-time rival. In an effort to move forward, he organizes a rematch and recruits former star quarterback Reno Hightower (Kurt Russell) to help bring the team together.

I was excited to watch this movie because I figured that anything with the two main characters played by Robin Williams and Kurt Russell had to be good. Unfortunately I was wrong. There isn’t anything hugely wrong with this movie, it’s just a mediocre comedy. Or maybe there is something wrong with it and the two lead actors’ performance elevated it to mediocre. In any case, the result is forgettable.

Save the Last Dance (2001)

Sara (Julia Stiles) used to be a passionate ballet dancer, but after her mother dies on her way to attending Sara’s Juilliard audition, she gives up dancing. She moves to her father’s apartment in Chicago and starts dating Derek (Sean Patrick Thomas), who helps her rekindle her dream of continuing ballet at Juilliard. But they also have to deal with the social consequences of being an interracial couple.

I’m usually a fan of teen coming-of-age movies, but I didn’t find Save the Last Dance very compelling. The core of the movie is the relationship between Sara and Derek, but I didn’t think the actors had good chemistry and the progression of their romance is non-existent – they seem to be either instantly in love or arguing just because the plot wanted them to. The characters surrounding them are pretty inconsistent too.